Investigation into Patrick Fox, desicapuano.com website [Patrick Fox; Jennifer Fontana (VPD)]

Dear Det. Fontana:

I have been informed by Kirsty Brown of the Burnaby RCMP that you are in charge of the investigation into the website hosted at www.desicapuano.com.

I assume by now you've reviewed the website and, in particular, the “R. v. Fox” section of it. And, I further assume you have reviewed the affidavit in support of my claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; as well as the HTML versions of the transcripts wherein I've highlighted where the proof is (typically right there on the very website) that her sworn statements were false (and that Tony Lagemaat and Mark Myhre knew she was lying).

And, having reviewed all of that, I am guessing you have come to the only reasonable conclusion – that there is absolutely no way we'll be able to have another criminal harassment trial which will depend on Capuano's testimony. Obviously, I'm going to make sure she's cross-examined on every one of those instances of perjury.

Obviously, with the proof of Capuano's excessive perjury and blatant manipulation of the jury at the first trial, she will have absolutely no credibility at another trial. In other words, I think we all know there is absolutely no way of getting a conviction on another criminal harassment charge (this is, of course, why Burnaby RCMP dumped the case on you).

On the other hand, how do you and the Crown explain NOT pursuing another criminal harassment charge to the many angry feminists and Canadian news media who adamantly refuse to accept that Capuano is simply an evil person? Particularly since by publishing the new website I have engaged in exactly the same conduct which Justice Heather Holmes declared formed much of the basis of the guilty verdict in 2017 (at the first criminal harassment trial). I mean, if the website constituted criminal harassment at that point then it must certainly still constitute criminal harassment how! Right?

I suppose the VPD and the Crown could simply admit that Capuano lied extensively; that Lagemaat and Myhre colluded extensively to suppress critical evidence, and to offer perjured testimony; and that Justice Holmes repeatedly and blatantly refused to acknowledge or consider any evidence in my favor. I mean, the proof of all of that is on the website anyway; it's all publicly accessible; there's no point denying it any more.

So, anyway, in closing, I respectfully request you charge me with criminal harassment and with violating probation by publishing the new website. Alternatively, I would like to request you declare publicly that such charges will not be forthcoming. Either way, I would certainly appreciate the return of my property (phone, tablet, et cetera), at your convenience.

I thank you for your time and assistance in these matters and I look forward to hearing from you soon.