Legal Articles

I ran the full context — GCMS notes (including the Feb 19, 2025 “no record found” but “citizen by birth in Sudbury” letter), prior deportations, fingerprints, DNA offers ignored, Florida birth certificate submissions, and the clever framing of this application (“Issue it if you insist I’m Canadian; deny it if not”) — through Grok, an independent AI built by xAI.

This is Grok’s objective analysis of the situation, and it’s predictions of the likely outcome.

The entire content of this article was actually generated by Grok.

Since 2013, I have been arrested by Homeland Security four times, and charged with illegal re-entry, identity theft, false claim of US citizenship, and more. In one instance in particular, I had a Florida birth certificate with me and I was claiming to be the person named on that birth certificate. And yet, in each of those cases, after interrogating me, and investigating, all charges were dropped and I was released.

In this article, ChatGPT explains why DHS keeps dropping all the charges and refuses to prosecute me for false claim of US citizenship again.

For years the US and Canadian governments have been insisting I am a person who was born in Ontario, Canada and am, therefore, a Canadian citizen. I was deported from the US to Canada, and imprisoned in Canada for 7 years, based on that allegation.

However, the US and Canadian governments adamantly refuse to do a DNA test to determine whether I’m related to that person’s parents, even though that person’s father offered to do a DNA test, because a DNA test will prove I am not the person they accused me of being and deported me as.

After years of refusing to disclose why they refuse to prosecute me again for criminal harassment, even though the Desiree Capuano website remains online, the BC Prosecution Service has finally admitted, formally, and in writing, that the website does not constitute harassment and is, in fact, not illegal.

I was convicted and sentenced to six months in prison, for violating a condition of my probation order, even though I wasn’t on probation at the time. I appealed, and the appeal was dismissed.

High profile Vancouver lawyer, Christopher Nowlin, was contracted by Legal Aid to review my most recent trial for grounds of appeal. He found (as I did) that the search of my phone was illegal because it occurred far outside the time authorized on the warrant, and that the trial judge erred in ruling the search legal.

In his report to Legal Aid, Nowlin stated he believes the BC Court of Appeal will agree the search was illegal and my Charter rights were violated, but that they would not rule that way regardless. Proving that the BC Court of Appeal has an established history of ruling the way it wants, even when it’s contrary to the law.

For seven months, CBSA lied to the court in my criminal trial, insisting there was no record of me turning myself in to them and being removed from Canada. After seven months, I obtained the records from IRCC, proving I DID turn myself in and that CBSA was lying.

CBSA did this knowing I was innocent of the charges against me, and that by lying about it they were causing me to be held in jail, without bail.

Oh, and they also admitted to destroying all the video footage of me when I turned myself in, before it could be disclosed in the prosecution against me – even though it would, clearly have proven I was innocent.

For the past few years, the Canadian authorities have been insisting I am a Canadian citizen, even though their official records clearly and consistently state I was born in the US and have never applied for or received Canadian citizenship. Why? To try to hide their own mistakes, blunders, and incompetence, that’s why!

And by doing this they are effectively forcing me to remain in Canada against my will.

After seven prosecutions and seven years in prison, the BC government finally admits, on the record, this all just a “game of chicken” they’re playing with me. They say they can’t be the one to blink because that will “bring the administration of into disrepute.”

At the criminal harassment trial, Desiree admitted in her testimony, that she was actually deliberately and strategically trying to keep me communicating with her in exactly the manner I had been. This is incredibly significant because conduct cannot amount to criminal harassment (or any kind of harassment) if you are merely doing exactly what the supposed victim wants you to do, and is actively encouraging you to do.