For those who don't yet know, I have spent, essentially, the past seven years in jail/prison in Canada, for creating a website on which I published proof of outrageous corruption, misconduct, injustice, and human rights violations on the parts of the BC Prosecution Service and the BC criminal court judges.
Believe it or not, on numerous occasions, various prosecutors have actually admitted in court, on the record, that the real reasons I am being prosecuted and imprisoned is because the BC government believes I am engaging them in a "game of chicken", thumbing my nose at them, and that because of the media attention my cases have gotten it is critical that the government not be the one to back down in this game of chicken. On another occasion, the prosecutor admitted, again in court, on the record, that the reason I am being prosecuted and imprisoned is because the disclosure material from my cases, which I have been using to prove my claims of corruption and misconduct, keeps getting published on the internet.
You might be thinking, "But wait! It's not illegal to mock and criticize the justice system; and it's most definitely not illegal to expose corruption and human rights violations in the justice system." You are absolutely correct. So you're next thought is probably, "Then how do they get away with imprisoning a person for seven years for not even doing anything illegal?" Well, that's another question which, perhaps, we'll address in another article. Right now we're concerned with the government openly admitting that these prosecutions have nothing to do with enforcing probation conditions or protected supposed victims.
A Game of Chicken
David Eby, former Attorney General for BC (we don't have a picture of Adam Flanders yet, sorry.)
At my bail hearing, in the matter of 244069-10-BC, on 2022-06-15, Crown Counsel Adam Flanders was making his submissions about why I shouldn't be released on bail. On and on, he went about what a bad, bad man I am; my refusal to comply with court orders; my insistence on continuing to subject my ex-wife to ongoing harassment with that disgusting website that I refuse to take down. This must not be allowed to stand, he says.
Then, the dumbass, for some reason which I will never, possibly, be able to comprehend, says:
But my position is that that cannot be allowed to stand that essentially the -- in this game of chicken that Mr. Fox has set up that the justice system can't blink on this type of order and that he needs to start following it.TR 2022-06-15 p12l10-14
Seems pretty fucking clear, right? He's saying that I "set up" "this game of chicken", and his statement that "the justice system can't blink" means the justice system, namely the BCPS, is actively participating in that game of chicken. They could have easily said "Mr. Fox is trying to engage us in a game of chicken, but we're not going to waste our time and tax-payers' resources on such stupid, petty things." But no, they said "We are stupid and petty so we're going to waste hundreds of thousands of tax dollars, and countless, finite man-hours and resources playing along in this game of chicken."
The funniest part, though, about these fools participating in this supposed "game of chicken" is that there is no game of chicken! I have been candid, from the outset, that I am using these prosecutions as a means of acquiring proof of corruption and misconduct on the parts of Capuano, the prosecutors and the judges. They're so obssessed with not backing down, and proving they're stronger than me, that they've been completely blind to what I've actually been doing.
Anyway... Flanders goes on to mention that over the years, I and my cases have received a lot of media attention. He then "urges" Judge Gordon to make a finding on the so-called tertiary ground because I have "essentially thumbed [my] nose at the justice system quite heavily for six years" TR 2022-06-15 p17l22-36. He then continues, "if Mr. Fox were released, it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and it should be noted for the public ... he is too great a risk on the primary, secondary and ultimately this tertiary ground to be released and it would bring the administration of justice into disrepute, in fact, in my submission, if he were released" TR 2022-06-15 p17l44-p18l7.
Regarding why Flanders would make such a damaging admission, on the record, I can only speculate. And I would speculate that it's because he's an idiot. Some have suggested he did it to help me, because he knew the case was bullshit and that the BCPS was lying. But my experience with the prosecutors of the BCPS is that they are, for the most part, pure evil. They don't care, at all, about innocence or guilt. If they know you're innocent, or the evidence prove's you're innocent, they'll just hide (or even destroy) the evidence, and lie. Don't think for one second that the prosecutors of the BCPS have a single ounce of decency or honor in them.
Where the Game Began
Now, let's not forget, the only thing I did was create a website - a perfectly legal website - which, initially, just exposed what a horrible cunt my ex-wife is. And, when the BCPS looked at the criminal harassment allegation in 2015, they concluded there was no cime being committed. And when the RCMP investigated it to determine if my PAL (firearms license) should be revoked, they also concluded there was no crime and no public safety concern. It wasn't until I posted an aritcle on the website on 2016-05-23, essentially telling all the idiotic feminists and soccer moms to go fuck themselves because there's nothing illegal about the website so the prosecutors, police, and courts can't do shit about it Yes! These Websites Are Still Here, Bitches!, then the BCPS decided the website constituted criminal harassment and decided to prosecute me for it. Immediately following my arrest on that, the BCPS agreed to my release on bail if I agreed to take down the website. I said, no.
I believe, the publishing of that article is where this supposed game of chicken began. How dare I say there's nothing the prosecutors and judges can do about it! I believe those small, petty minds over at the BC Prosecution Service saw that as me saying they're impotent, powerless. But, of course, I wasn't. I was saying there is no crime being committed, so it is outside the concern of the people who are responsible for enforcing and upholding the law. Kind of like if I say to an auto mechanic that I'm not going to bring my car in for repairs because there's nothing malfunctioning on it. I'm not saying the mechanic is incompetent - I'm saying his services are not required because my car is not broken.
And then, of course, you follow that up with me declining their offer of my release on bail - what a slap in the face that must have been for them. Well, fuck 'em, I wasn't there to make friends!
Judge Ellen Gordon Insists Flanders Never Said That
Judge Ellen Gordon
Here's where things really get surreal.
So, after Flanders made his submissions for the Crown, it was my turn. During my submissions, I mentioned Flanders statement about the "game of chicken" TR 2022-06-24 p3l45-p4l11. And would you believe, Gordon actually denied Flanders said that! She actually argued with me, she insisted he never said anything about "a game", and that he certainly didn't mean to suggest that there was a game being played between the prosecutor's office and myself TR 2022-06-24 p4l12-31. Gordon was very visibly agitated by this. She even raised her voice at me and became very assertive.
Gordon then went on to praise Flanders, insisting he is "an honorable man". I responded, "It's funny. Every judge I've encountered says that the Crown counsel is honorable" TR 2022-06-24 p4l33-40.
At this point, my head is about to explode. I mean, doesn't this fucking psychotic, compulsively lying judge realize that this is all going to be in the transcripts? Do these judges even care about being exposed for being lying, cheating, corrupt bastards? It sure seems they don't.
Publishing Disclosure Material
Chris Johnson, Prosecutor
Then there was the time Crown Counsel Chris Johnson admitted, on the record in court, in the matter of 244069-7-B, that the reason I am being prosecuted and imprisoned is because my disclosure material keeps ending up on the internet.
The BCPS had taken back the external hard drive they had provided me three days before the trial, containing the disclosure material for that case. And I had made multiple requests to the BCPS and to Johnson to have it returned to me so I could use it to prepare for sentencing.
In court, on 2021-02-02, I said if Johnson has any concerns about me publishing the disclosure material he can rest assured that's going to happen, regardless of whether they return the hard drive to me, because the material has already been copied - I just don't have a copy with me in the jail. Johnson replied, "I think that may be why you're here today, Mr. Fox, because it was published" TR 2021-02-02 p4l12-22. And Judge Gregory Rideout agreed with Johnson.
So there you have it. The truth about why the BC government has been prosecuting me and had me locked up for seven years. Not because they believed I committed any crime, or because they believe I've harmed that evil, narcissistic, sociopath, ex-wife of my. No, it's because I made them look like fools and they believe I'm playing a game of chicken with them.
Obviously, this is not a legitimate reason to prosecute and imprison a person, but apparently it's only corruption, tyranny, and human rights violations when other countries do it. Fucking Canada! Bunch of self-righteous hypocrites.
In Vancouver: random attacks, open drug use, ODs, murder, and they’re using space in prison to hold this guy? Please stop with your game of chicken. This is not a game.
Yes, I agree.
And when the COVID state of emergency was declared, everybody in the BC jails were single bunked so they could only house half as many people. And still they chose to keep Fox in one of those cells while allowing rapists, murderers, and junkies out on bail because there was no room for them in the jails. Yay, BC justice system!