News media control and manipulation of criminal prosecutions and verdicts in BC [Patrick Fox; David Eby]
PO Box 1500
Maple Ridge, BC
V2X 7G3
2909 W. Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 2G6
Dear Mr. Eby:
I can now inform you that I intend to prove and to publicly expose that the BCPS has, on specific occasions, approved charges against me and prosecuted those charges, based solely on prior news coverage related to the underlying allegation of the charges and their concern about the possibility of further news coverage which might embarrass the BCPS or might adversely affect the public's perception of the BCPS – regardless of the fact that the BCPS knew the news coverage was false and misleading, that I was not guilty of the charges, and that they did not have a reasonable likelihood of obtaining a conviction.
As I've pointed out previously, the more times the BCPS prosecutes me for breach of probation for refusing to take down the website, while simultaneously refusing to prosecute me for criminal harassment based on that same website the more they are proving they DO NOT believe the website constitutes criminal harassment – which, in turn, proves they knew I was not guilty of criminal harassment when they prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced me for it in 2016-2017. (And, of course, the probation order which they keep prosecuting and imprisoning me for violating is part of the sentence for that same criminal harassment conviction which they are effectively admitting they know is false.)
I would expect at least three prosecutions and conviction for breaching the probation order by refusing to take down the website in order to establish a pattern on the part of the BCPS and the judges (i.e. the justice system). I currently have two. Which means I need to be prosecuted and convicted of it at least one more time. On the current charge, the Crown said they were seeking 18-24 months and further probation. Historically, in all of the cases against me, the court has granted exactly the sentence the Crown requested. So I assumed, on the current matter, I'd be sentenced to 24 months with no probation. That would put my release date at late January/early February 2022 – AFTER all of the other probation orders had expired. Which means there would no longer be a probation condition requiring me to take down the website or prohibiting me from publishing anything about Capuano. That would preclude me from being able to get a third conviction. So, I had to make sure that upon my release from my current incarceration there would still be a probation order in place requiring me to take down the website. Hence my prior letters antagonizing the BCPS for not seeking a further probation order – knowing that the absolute most important thing to them is saving face. But then the judge went and sentenced me to only 16.5 months, which puts my release at August 12, 2021 – so I'll still be subject to the 2017 probation order anyway. But the new order ensures that if the Crown makes up new charges just before my release or “gates me” - in order to delay my release – then no matter when I get released I will still be subject to those two conditions and, therefore, able to obtain that third conviction.
And of course, it is also critical for me to be able to prove that each conviction has clearly not been supported by the evidence, in order to be able to show a consistent pattern on the part of the judges. So far the judges have been making that incredibly easy for me to prove though, so I'm not very concerned in that respect.
Do you still not see, Mr. Eby, how the BCPS and the judges just keep digging themselves deeper and deeper into this hole they've put themselves in? And do you not see how they are, inevitably, dragging you and the entire justice system down with them? Have you not noticed that the more time goes by the more evidence I have been obtaining and publishing of more and more corruption and misconduct on the parts of more and more justice system participants? Have you not noticed that I have been obtaining and publishing more and more evidence proving that every single thing I have said and claimed is, in fact, true? Have you not noticed that the BCPS has not been able to get a single conviction against me without relying on withholding or destroying evidence, offering perjured testimony, and baldly lying to the court? And have you not noticed that each time they've prosecuted me I've obtained and published the proof of all of their misconduct? And have you not noticed that over the past five years the BCPS, the VPD, the RCMP, CBSA, and even the US DHS have failed to find one single thing that I have done wrong – not even a single, tiny white lie? Even all those angry, raging feminists in the Canadian news media who hate me so much have yet to find a single bad thing that I've done.
Patrick Fox