More BCPS and BC court corruption and incompetence [Patrick Fox; David Eby]
1451 Kingsway Ave
Port Coquitlam, BC
V3C 1S2
2909 W. Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 2G6
Dear Mr. Eby:
I am forwarding you a copy of a letter I recently sent to Crown Counsel Jennifer Horneland who is handling one of my current appeals. It is the case where I was convicted of breaching probation by leaving BC without permission and being within 100 meters of the U.S. border.
Of particular interest is the last paragraph on page 2, where I talk about the BCSC judge denying my 684 application based on my statements at the 684 hearing that if I disagreed with the appointed lawyer's professional judgment regarding the grounds of appeal that I would not accept the lawyer's professional judgment and would proceed on my own anyway. This is interesting because what I ACTUALLY said at the 684 hearing was that I WOULD accept the appointed lawyer's professional judgment. The exact opposite of what the judge claimed in her reasons for judgment. And when I pointed this out to the judge she said "It doesn't matter. I'm not going to change my decision." Thank God for the DARS and the transcripts, right?
Tell me Mr. Eby, how can you people, here in Canada, call this a "justice" system? And then we have Justice Heather Holmes accusing ME of playing games and abusing the process. But haven't I merely been responding to the corruption and injustice that THEY (the BCPS and the various judges) have initiated and have been injecting into my cases?
Anyway, I also turn your attention to the postscript of the enclosed letter. The Crown clearly knows that I am right and that Officer Polisak was so clearly lying about the application of the immigration laws within a port of entry, and about CBSA's duties and burdens within a port of entry. I mean, when a prosecutor comes with a tonne of indirect and sideways arguments and consistently REFUSES to address or even respond to the substance of the ground of appeal … well, at that point it's obvious to everybody that she knows she is wrong and she has no case, but she's too insecure and petty to admit it – she MUST save face – that is, after all, the most important thing to a BC prosecutor. Right? And yes, I do realize that by saying (and publishing) things like that I am antagonizing the prosecutors (and some judges) which will only make them want to prosecute me and stick it to me that much more. That is the point. That is EXACTLY the point!
Patrick Fox
The charge that I am currently in custody on is that I breached the probation order (which was issued in April 2021) by failing to take down the desicapuano.com website within 48 hours of my release from custody (on 2021-08-12). The previous charge, from which the aforementioned probation order resulted, was also that I breached probation (that order being issued in August 2020) by failing to take down the desicapuano.com website within 48 hours of my release from custody (on 2020-08-20). For that I was sentenced to 16.5 months in prison and served an actual 11 months.
But here's where things get fascinating: In November 2017 Justice Holmes imposed a probation order on me which took effect 2018-12-30 and doesn't expire until 2021-12-29. So it was in effect while everything discussed above was occurring. Condition 14 of that probation order reads as follows:
You must not use the Internet or any computer or cellular network except as required to fulfill Condition 13, for the purpose of employment, or for sending personal emails.
So, the probation orders issued by Judge Phillips (August 2020) and Judge Rideout (April 2021) explicitly ordered me to engage in conduct which would cause me to breach Condition 14 of the Justice Holmes' order!
And that is all there is to say about that. I very much look forward to the trial in this current matter.