Lying to the court about the disclosure material not being encrypted [Patrick Fox; Chris Johnson (BCPS); Devid Eby]
PDF1451 Kingsway Ave
Port Coquitlam, BC
V3C 1S2
Crown Counsel
222 Main St, #204
Vancouver, BC V6A 2S8
Dear Mr. Johnson:
When two people are accusing each other of lying about a particular matter (e.g. about whether or not the files provided on a disclosure hard drive are encrypted); and one party (the receiver) insists that they ARE encrypted and therefore inaccessible and useless to him, and the other party (the provider) insists that they ARE NOT encrypted; and this debate occurs in a public forum which is being recorded (e.g. in open court); and that provider agrees to take the hard drive to his people to verify that the files are encrypted then shortly thereafter returns to the courtroom and states on the record that he verified the files are in fact NOT encrypted and he suggests, on the record, that the other party is not being forthright on the matter; and the other party, the receiver, then demands the provider put a laptop on the table right there, in open court, in the presence of the judge, and on the DARS, and on the record, and let's try to open those files right now, let's get to the bottom of this matter and prove who is lying and who is telling the truth, and let's do it in the open for all the world to see; and then the other party, the provider, demands that NOT be done, and the only reason he offers is that it's "not necessary"; and considering that such a test would take less than 5 minutes and would prove beyond all doubt what the truth of the matter was; well, sir, given that exact scenario 100% of all of the people in the world will agree that the party who is demanding that a laptop NOT be put on the table and the truth of the matter NOT be proven publicly, in front of everyone and on the record, is clearly and unquestionably the one who is lying!
Now notice: What I've just described is exactly what happened in court yesterday. And when the recording and the transcript of the hearing are published not a single person is going to believe you and the BCPS were telling the truth. You words and actions don't cease to exist once the hearing ends – there is a whole world that exists outside the courtroom.
Patrick Fox
In case you missed the point, your adamant refusal to agree to take five minutes, in court, on the record, yesterday, while simultaneously suggesting I am lying, is sufficient proof that YOU were the one that was lying and that you knew I was telling the truth.
And the fact that this same tactic of providing encrypted files has now been proven to have happened 3 times in 3 separate cases, is sufficient to establish a pattern.
Another pattern you will notice is that you have prosecuted me on 3 separate cases and in each case, on the first day of the trial you sought an adjournment in order to delay the trial and prolong my incarceration (through, to be fair, on the second instance you didn't explicitly request it, you just withheld the disclosure until 3 days before trial expecting I would then say I'm not ready and require an adjournment). It's all about being able to establish patterns, right? In order to prove that conduct is deliberate and malicious?
1451 Kingsway Ave
Port Coquitlam, BC
V3C 1S2
2909 W. Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 2G6
Dear Mr. Eby:
I'm forwarding you a copy of a letter I recently sent to the so-called "ad hoc Crown Counsel" Chris Johnson, regarding the events that transpired in open court, on the record, on 2021-10-14.
I highly recommend you listen to the DARS recording of the appearance in order to get the full effect, but I'm sure from the enclosed letter you get the gist. Once again the BCPS has trapped itself into a corner in their attempts to persecute me and must now tell completely implausible lies on the record in court in order to try to save face. This is really becoming quite habitual for them.
And once again the BCPS has inadvertently generated and provided me more evidence of my claims of corruption and misconduct. Everything that is stated in court is recorded. Johnson's and the court's refusal to allow me to plug the hard drive into a laptop to prove Johnson had just lied in and to the court is all on the DARS – which means it will inevitably be on the website. And as for the encrypted disclosure files, they've already been copied and uploaded to a server in a not-so-far-away country so Johnson and the BCPS cannot claim they did not provide me encrypted files – anybody in the world can access the files and see that they're encrypted.
[Long sigh!] Ah, good times, Mr. Eby. Good times.
Patrick Fox